Will the bigot Robert Spencer accept a challenge to debate??
To this day the bigot Robert Spencer has not responded to this fact filled post, *THAT IS IN PRINT* as he demands of Jalal, but still claims that no Muslim wants to debate him or refute his erroneous claims that the al-qaeda version of Islam represents the real Islam.
This very site is full of refutations of his bad understanding but he does not want to let his followers know about them. He still insists that all Muslim are a bunch of evil heathens that need to be destroyed
Now Jalal Abu al Rub - who is highly qualified to take him on - has challenged him to debate…will that racist respond to the challenge? Read this exchange
I once again challenge Robert Spencer to respond to this post and we will see if he continues his claim that the Khawarij represent the real Islam as he claimed as lately as today in which he claims in this post about the demented Takir wal Hijrah group.
Mr Spencer, people are responding to your erroneous claims, but you are not responding. You clearly have an agenda to smear all Muslims and it is not going to work. My challenge still stands
5 Comments so far
Leave a reply
He’s making money off of hating Islam with BS. He doesn’t want to lose business.
Islam is a religion founded by a pedophile!
Per the e-mail exchange, Spencer offered an immediate print debate, which was refused by Jalal.
He also accepted the face-to-face debate, but could not commit to a place and time until early next year.
That is the reality.
No Moslem should debate a Moslem hater or an apostate. No, No and No. You give respect for these Moslem haters to appear with them on TV or to debate them on radio. These are scums and never, never debate any one of them. Aljazeera committed a crime to invite the Moslem hater Wafa Sultan to debate a Moslem scholar and he was an idiot to fall to this bait.
shary,
I fail to comprehend any logic in your statements. The truth is the truth, no matter who utters it.
The general definition of debate is:
a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers.